Sociologist Steven Yearley takes a long look at the way in which ideas such
as “think globally, act locally” spring from a mistaken assumption that we all
mean the same thing when we discuss the world or global problems. In Sociology,
Environmentalism, Globalization (Sage, £12.95, ISBN 0 8039 7517 1), he
asserts that in capturing the moral high ground by claiming the planet for
themselves, environmentalists are ignoring the fragmented nature of many of the
problems they want to resolve. And the emotional construct that hangs round the
notion that we are all global now, united in defence of planet Earth, obscures
the real forces acting to damage the environment. Even the role of science as
arbiter of quarrels about pollution, for example, is questioned.
More from New ¾«¶«´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Space
Mercury may have gained all of its unexpected water in a single day
News

Health
Experimental mRNA vaccine may protect against multiple Ebola viruses
News

Mind
Political anger affects the body differently to other forms of anger
News

Health
Australia is battling its largest diphtheria outbreak in living memory
News
Popular articles
Trending New ¾«¶«´«Ã½ articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
3
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
4
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
5
Can we harness quantum effects to create a new kind of healthcare?
6
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
7
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
8
Political anger affects the body differently to other forms of anger
9
Where did the laws of physics come from? I think I've found the answer
10
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first