Glacial ice seen melting in Greenland Radius Images / Alamy
We could be on the verge of triggering a series of cascading tipping points that result in the planet warming 4 or 5掳C hotter than the pre-industrial benchmark.
That, at least, is the view of聽a group of 16 climate scientists, who have spelled out a聽scenario in which聽sea levels would be 10 to 60 metres higher than today. This warming would continue even if we ceased pumping CO2 into the atmosphere – and the threshold could be as low as 2掳C.
If they are right,聽it聽means that the supposed 鈥渟afe鈥 limit for global warming set out in the Paris agreement might be anything but. 鈥淭wo degrees may actually be very dangerous,鈥 says Johan Rockstrom of Stockholm University, who is one of the 16.
Advertisement
For most of the past half billion years, Earth was much hotter than today, with no permanent ice at the poles: the hothouse Earth state. Three million years ago, as carbon dioxide levels fell, it began oscillating between two cooler states: ice ages in which great ice sheets covered much land in the northern hemisphere, and interglacials like the present.
Unstable
The aim of the Paris agreement is to limit warming to 2掳C by 2100. But if Rockstrom and co are right, we might be on the brink of pushing the planet out of the present interglacial state and into the hothouse earth state. This means it might not be possible to stabilise global temperature at this level.
Even if we manage to limit warming to 2掳C by 2100 – we are currently on course for 3 or 4掳C by 2100 – warming would continue over the next few centuries even if all our greenhouse gas emissions ceased.
鈥淭he first cluster of tipping points in the climate system is centered around 2掳C warming,鈥 says team member John Schellnhuber of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. 鈥淭he perturbation could push the planetary machinery out of the glacial cycle.鈥
The team stress that they are pointing out a potential danger that needs study, not that they have shown conclusively that this will happen. 鈥淲e are discussing a possibility, not a probability, and ask the scientific community to put our scenario to the test,鈥 says Schellnhuber.聽聽Indeed, other climate scientists that New 精东传媒 spoke to – who did not wish to be named –聽expressed scepticism at its findings聽although others thought it was reasonable.
鈥淚t is plausible that if we exceed some temperature threshold we will place Earth in a different climate state,鈥 says Jeffrey Kiehl of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the US, who studies climate change in the past and present, and was not involved in the study.
PNAS DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810141115
Topics:



